Ostensibly about easing construction of affordable housing, Oregon HB 2007 is instead both a disservice to affordable housing and a specific harm to historic districts Download Arduino Fritz. The bill takes a “one size fits all” approach that overrides local controls over issues like design review and zoning and potentially encourages the demolition of smaller, less expensive homes 젠킨스 플러그인 다운로드. In other words, the bill is the proverbial wolf in sheep’s clothing.
The Architectural Heritage Center is working closely with other organizations to respond quickly and productively to HB 2007 in its current form and to work together with bill sponsor House Speaker Tina Kotek 저글러스 다운로드. While the AHC favors thoughtful solutions for communities facing housing pressures, including the construction of affordable housing and increased density, we believe that this can be accomplished without compromising logical design guidelines for historic districts 갤럭시 카카오톡 다운로드. We support provisions and amendments in the bill that will augment the supply of affordable housing and increase density, but not the needless demolition of good old houses which are already constructed 무료 고전게임 다운로드.
Many advocates for HB 2007 have assumed that proponents of affordable housing and historic preservationists are diametrically opposed windows 다운로드. The truth is that there are innumerable examples of successful affordable housing projects in historic districts and individual landmark buildings across the country Odin3.13 Download. Here in Portland, one can look at both the renovation of the Clifford Hotel and the Erickson-Fritz Building by Innovative Housing Inc luxury mp3 called tsachi. as exemplars of adapting old buildings for a new use. Across the country, from Pittsburgh to Shreveport, there are excellent examples of long-standing programs that keep lower-income residents in their homes while providing loans and assistance for renovation, along with constructing infill for added density and vitality windows 8.1 update.
Oregon has long been committed to the protection of historic resources, as summed up in Goal 5 of the Statewide Planning Goals and Guidelines. While the intent of HB 2007 to create more affordable housing is laudable, it turns back the clock on other state and local goals in a way that is particularly harmful to the character buildings and important spaces which shape our communities and encourage visits by tourists 카톡 프사 다운로드. Certainly, we are in favor of streamlined design review and permitting for affordable housing–especially for new construction. Let’s continue to encourage positive ways to include higher density in existing neighborhoods, such as ADUs, but also protect important community standards for other aspects of livability.
You can help by expressing your concerns to legislators about the bill and its damaging ramifications to both affordable housing and historic preservation. Please email Speaker Kotek as well as your representatives and senators in the state legislature to share your opinions. Find your representatives here.